May 4, 2022 · While the Court doubts that just three colonial regulations could suffice to show a tradition of public-carry regulation, even looking at these laws on their own terms, the Court is not convinced …

The session begins with the announcement of opinions - decisions in argued cases - followed by the swearing in of new members to the Bar of the Supreme Court. These sessions, which typically last …

banned by the statute. Pet.App. 30a. The court held that the AR-15 and similar weapons are not protected by the Second Amendment in part because they are not “suitable” for self-defense

As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution.

prohibits law-abiding, adult citizens from buying handguns from FFLs on account of their age, whereas the university resolutions simply disarmed students while on school grounds. Not only are these …

But the Court’s opinion in Hardison contained this oft-quoted sentence: “To require TWA to bear more than a de minimis cost in order to give Hardison Saturdays off is an undue hardship.”

Specifically, it claimed that “[t]he Supreme Court held that schools qualify as sensitive places because of localized, non-controversial laws that prohibited firearms at a few schools, and those laws were first …

[1] Criminal Law Review De Novo Court of Appeals reviews district court's decision to grant motion to dismiss indictment de novo.

Petitioners would have this Court depart from its usual practice and take this case now, at this early stage, based largely on a manufactured narrative that there is “open hostility” to this Court’s Bruen …

This Court has already recognized that armed self-defense is a fundamental natural right and that the Second Amendment “codified a pre-existing right,” not one “granted” by Congress or the ratifying …